Making The Invisible Visible: Tracking Research Effort In Agile Metrics

Quantifying Research Work in Agile Frameworks

Research work is often an overlooked effort in Agile frameworks. As an intangible activity, quantifying nebulous research tasks can be challenging. However, making research work transparent is critical for planning and tracking. Techniques like linking research to features, adding metadata to tickets, and analyzing velocity can elucidate the research process.

Defining research as an distinct body of work is the first step in quantifying it. Research includes activities like discovering technical solutions, evaluating alternatives, prototyping, and investigating open questions related to a product or feature. Dedicating effort to knowledge acquisition differentiates research from direct feature development.

The nebulous nature of research makes it easy to deprioritize. With no concrete artifacts to show, research often gets cut when timeline pressures build. This leads to technical debt and knowledge gaps down the road. Making research work transparent with metrics can help teams dedicate necessary efforts upfront.

Techniques like pointing research tasks, tracking research velocity, and linking research to features can elucidate efforts. Pointing assigns Story Points to research work to quantify level of effort. Velocity measures rate of progress through pointing research Sprints or Spikes. Metadata can tag user stories with related research efforts.

Establishing Traceability of Research Tasks

Linking research work directly to features, stories, and tasks enables traceability. This mapping illustrates how research efforts enable future feature development. Teams can tie research Spikes and background reading to specific stories in ticketing systems. This linkage enables tracking time spent per feature area.

Adding rich descriptors for research tasks also improves their visibility. Metadata can tag user stories with keywords about related research. This may include technologies investigated, options explored, or knowledge domains covered. Descriptors make it easier to track relevance of efforts over time.

Ideally, research tracking should happen directly within existing Agile management systems. Augmenting task tickets with research metadata avoids dual-system challenges. Enabled by flexible ticketing tools, this research-oriented enhancement of Agile methodologies improves visibility.

Measuring Research Output

To understand the value of research activities, teams must quantify output. Metrics like research velocity, knowledge gain, and research debt communicate productivity, improvement opportunities, and risks.

Tracking velocity of research sprints provides insight on throughput. This assessment technique measures the amount of research work a team completes in each Sprint. Comparing research velocity across sprints enables trend analysis over time. Improving velocity may indicate growing team efficiencies.

Knowledge gain offers a proxy for output by estimating learning acquired through research. Teams can quantify knowledge in story points or through scoring against learning objectives. This form of evaluative metadata demonstrates whether research met intended goals. Analyzing cumulative gain offers insight on pace of innovation.

Research debt refers to the accrued cost of missing or incomplete research. When shortcuts are taken, knowledge gaps causes debt that eventually requires payment through delayed features or rework. Tracking debt focuses attention on addressing gaps to avoid higher costs later.

Research Visibility Enables Better Planning

Making research efforts transparent enables more strategic planning cycles. Teams can forecast research needs for upcoming features based on past linkage analysis. This lookback practice helps predict the level of investigation necessary to embark on new product areas.

Understanding overhead research activities require is also essential for planning. When quantified, teams can assess total capacity available for feature development vs. innovation. Building allocation for research overhead into plans helps set realistic milestones given team bandwidth.

Analyzing past research metrics also enables optimization around team composition and roles. For research intensive products, dedicated roles may be necessary to prevent bottlenecks. Understanding specialization needs and staffing appropriately enables balancing delivery with ongoing learning.

Sustaining Research Focus

To incentivize research, teams require dedicated time free from delivery pressures. Allocating sprints or spikes specifically for knowledge gain helps foster focus without distractions from immediate feature requests.

Building a research-conscious culture also sustains motivation for inquiry. Leadership can encourage intellectual curiosity, exploration of alternatives, and knowledge sharing. Framing research as a creative endeavor empowers teams to answer their own questions.

Continuous attention to research metrics enables sustaining motivation. By analyzing trends over time, teams can evaluate whether research initiatives fade away without conscious prioritization. Tracking can diagnose an out-of-sight out-of-mind trap where research efforts dwindle unconsciously over time without oversight.


Making research visible is imperative for Agile teams driving innovation while balancing delivery needs. Techniques for measurement, traceability, and oversight help quantify research efforts. Leadership plays an equally critical role by encouraging a research-conscious culture focused on lasting knowledge gain. With dedicated time for investigation and learning built into plans, teams can focus on exploration without losing sight of inquiry and intellectual curiosity crucial to continued innovation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *